Appwrite vs Supabase: Everything You Need to Know

When choosing a backend platform for your app or business, the options can seem endless. Two popular contenders in this space are Appwrite and Supabase—both offering services for managing databases, authentication and more. But how do they stack up against each other in terms of performance, scalability, and cost? This guide will break it down in simple terms to help you make the best decision for your business.

The Basics: What Are Appwrite and Supabase?

Both Appwrite and Supabase are backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms that allow developers to focus on building applications without worrying too much about the underlying infrastructure. They both offer cloud-hosted and self-hosted options, meaning you can either use their cloud services or run them on your own server for more control and potentially lower costs.

• Appwrite is known for being lightweight and efficient, with fewer resource demands, making it ideal for smaller servers or those on a budget.
• Supabase is often compared to Firebase and is great for handling more complex tasks like managing large SQL databases. However, it tends to use more server resources and may require higher costs to maintain performance.

Performance Comparison: Which One Scales Better?

I tested both platforms under simulated eCommerce conditions, where virtual users performed typical actions like logging in and viewing product listings. Here’s what I found:

• Appwrite consistently outperformed Supabase, especially when scaling up to handle more users. For example, with a self-hosted setup on a Hetzner server costing just 5 euros per month, Appwrite comfortably handled up to 2,000 users per day, while Supabase struggled with larger loads.
• On a more powerful server setup costing around 30 euros per month, Appwrite handled up to 250 simultaneous users, while Supabase hit its limit with only 45 users.

Cloud vs Self-Hosting: Which Is Right for You?

Both Appwrite and Supabase offer cloud and self-hosting options. However, self-hosting can offer better control, scalability, and cost savings in the long run.

• Cloud: If you’re just starting out or building a PoC, you might opt for the cloud versions. Both platforms offer free tiers, but be careful—scaling on the cloud can quickly become expensive.
• Self-Hosting: For businesses that want more control and scalability without breaking the bank, self-hosting is the way to go. With self-hosted servers, you have more flexibility and avoid the sometimes complex and escalating costs of cloud services.

The Cost Breakdown: How to Keep Your Budget Low

One of the key reasons to consider Appwrite or Supabase is cost efficiency. Unlike AWS, which can easily cost 100 euros or more per month as your user base grows, both platforms offer much more affordable self-hosting options.

Here’s a quick snapshot of what you can expect in terms of costs:

• Appwrite: You can comfortably support thousands of users on a server costing as little as 5 euros per month. For heavier usage, scaling up to a more powerful setup at 30 euros per month allows you to handle hundreds of simultaneous users.
• Supabase: While Supabase is still affordable, it tends to hit its performance limits faster, meaning you may need to invest in more expensive hardware sooner if your user base grows rapidly.

Ease of Use: Which One Is More Business-Friendly?

Both platforms are relatively easy to set up, but there are some key differences:

• Appwrite offers a smooth self-hosting experience, with fewer restrictions and less setup complexity. This makes it ideal for businesses that want to get up and running quickly without dealing with a steep learning curve.
• Supabase is a bit more complex to configure, especially in a self-hosted environment. Some features are restricted or limited when self-hosted, which can make it less flexible if you need certain functionality out of the box.

Key Guidelines to Remember

When choosing between Appwrite and Supabase, here are a few guidelines to help you decide:

1. Start with cloud for small PoCs: If you’re just experimenting or building a small proof of concept, the free tiers on both platforms will work well.
2. Choose Appwrite for most cases: If performance, efficiency, and ease of use are top priorities, Appwrite is your best bet. It’s lighter, faster, and less resource-hungry, making it ideal for businesses looking to grow without incurring huge costs.
3. Use Supabase for specific features: Supabase shines if you need particular features like SQL databases, but be aware that it consumes more resources and may require more maintenance.
4. Avoid Supabase if you plan to self-host: Supabase is better suited for cloud hosting. If you know you’ll need to move to self-hosting later, Appwrite will likely offer a smoother transition and better long-term performance.
5. Combine small and large instances for cost-effective scaling: One great advantage of self-hosting is the ability to mix and match server sizes to optimize performance. You can run lighter processes on a cheaper server and reserve the more expensive, powerful instances for database-heavy tasks.

Numbers to Keep in Mind

If you’re managing 50,000 users per month, here’s a rough breakdown:

• You’ll likely need to handle around 250 users per hour, assuming most traffic is concentrated in peak hours.
• Using Appwrite on a 5-euro server, you can easily manage these traffic levels without performance issues.
• As your traffic grows, you can scale up incrementally to more powerful servers for as little as 30 euros per month, still supporting thousands of simultaneous users without a hitch.

The Bottom Line: Which One Is Best for Your Business?

• Choose Appwrite if you’re looking for a lightweight, budget-friendly solution that scales well and performs reliably. It’s ideal for most app types and offers excellent value for the money.
• Choose Supabase if your project demands specific features that Appwrite doesn’t offer, but keep in mind that it may require more resources and could cost more to scale.

Overall, Appwrite offers the best balance of performance, cost-efficiency, and ease of use for most businesses, especially when self-hosting is an option. Supabase, while a strong platform in its own right, is better suited for more specialized needs or cloud-based projects where its limitations won’t be a problem.

By following these guidelines and understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each platform, you’ll be in a great position to choose the right backend solution for your business.